SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE
The latest publications about the Cube Navigation System
Krammer, L., Kadrijaj, V., Hostettler, R., et al.
CIRSE, 2022
Poster Presentation. First evaluation of accuracy and efficiency of the Access Cube as compared to the standard of care Free Hand Method. Statistically significantly improved accuracy and overall lower intervention time. The number of CT scans was reduced to 1.4 versus FHM 2.8.
Grigoriadis, S.; Filippiadis, D.; Stamatopoulou, V. et al.
Medicina, 2022
Five clinical cases of splanchnic nerve radiofrequency neurolysis were performed using the Cube Navigation System. The Puncture Cube was found to be simple to use, while allowing for highly accurate needle placement and optimal calculation of double oblique access routes.
Mokry, A., Willmitzer, F., Hostettler, R. et al.
Neuroradiology, 2019
Assessment of the Puncture Cube as compared to the standard of care Free Hand Method. Accuracy and time requirements were compared in this ex-vivo, phantom study.
Puncture Cube resulted in a statistically significantly improved accuracy and overall lower intervention time. Number of CT scans was reduced to 2.3 versus FHM 2.8.
Scharll, Y., Mitteregger, A., Lamier, G. et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2022
Assessment of the Puncture Cube as compared to a robotic navigation device.
Puncture Cube was found to be competitive with other navigational systems on the market as well as having 30% faster procedure time, not including set up or breakdown time.
Additional Technology
Stauffer, T., Lohmeyer, Q., et al
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 2024
Assessment of an Augmented Reality (AR) application, developed in a partnership with ETH Zurich's Product Development Group, for training users of the Cube Navigation System. The AR app was found to enhance training performance and user experience over traditional methods.